There are no items in your cart
Add More
Add More
| Item Details | Price | ||
|---|---|---|---|
The Almost-Burnt-Out Caretaker (Article 5 of 8) - The person holding everyone else together while coming apart themselvesPicture this. Shreya is the first person that her colleagues message when something goes wrong. Is she a senior member of the team? No! What does she do? She just ‘always’ responds and listens. Shreya has a way of making people feel that whatever they are going through is manageable, that things will be alright soon, that someone is standing right beside them to help. She has had four of these ‘helping others’ conversations today. She also has a deadline for her deliverables tomorrow that she has not started working on yet. She skipped lunch because a colleague needed to debrief after a difficult client call. She has not told her manager that she is struggling, because the last time she mentioned it, he said, "I don't know what we would do without you." and she took that as a compliment. It was also a reason for Shreya to keep going. Tonight, she will work until midnight to catch up on her own deliverables. Tomorrow, she will do it all again. And the same, the day after. Shreya or her manager is yet to realize that ‘this’ pattern is draining her so steadily to even notice sooner.
Meet our Almost-Burnt-Out Caretaker in this article series.
The Almost-Burnt-Out Caretaker is one of the most valuable and most overlooked people in any team. They are like the emotional infrastructure of a workplace, always supporting people around them. They notice when someone is struggling, make new joiners feel welcome, help hold the team together through difficult periods and ensure that the experience of being at work is far kinder and more humane than it would otherwise be. Hence, they are also running on a reserve that no one is replenishing. Here is what this workplace human archetype typically looks like:
It may look like the Almost-Burnt-Out Caretaker is a victim of their own kindness. But it’s not. They are a product of environments and social conditioning that have taught them that their value lies in how well they serve others. Today, we will begin our work by understanding this very distinction.
What Gives Rise to Emotional Caretakers in Teams?
This is no coincidence. While these personalities are shaped by many factors, they often emerge to fill the gap between a team's emotional needs and the lack of support available to meet them.
Most workplaces have systems for project tracking, performance management and resource allocation but there is rarely a system for ensuring that people feel psychologically supported, heard or emotionally safe during difficult periods. Into that gap, the Caretaker steps because they noticed the need and had the capacity, at some point, to meet it.
Fatima's story illustrates how this often begins. She joined her new team during a period of significant organizational change. Two senior leaders had recently left and the team’s morale was low. She started checking in on colleagues informally, facilitating difficult conversations and being the calm presence in a room full of uncertainty. She was good at it. She was appreciated for it. Nobody asked her to stop when the change period ended, so she did not.
Many Caretakers have a long history of being the person others lean on, whether in families, friendships or previous roles. For some, the role of emotional supporter was assigned early in life. They learnt that keeping others comfortable was how you earned belonging, appreciation or stability. The workplace simply becomes another stage for a pattern that already exists.
Meera's story reflects this pattern. As the eldest of four siblings in a household where both parents worked long hours, she became the family's unofficial caretaker. She noticed when a younger sibling was struggling, diffused arguments before they escalated and made sure everyone else was settled before attending to her own needs. She was praised for it repeatedly. By the time she entered the workforce, holding things together was simply how she understood her value.
It is an adaptation. But an adaptation that is useful in one context can become draining in another, particularly without reciprocity.
One of the reasons the Almost-Burnt-Out Caretaker keeps caretaking is that they are genuinely good at it. They are emotionally perceptive, patient and trustworthy. Colleagues feel better after speaking with them. That positive feedback reinforces the behaviour, causing the role to expand without anyone stopping to ask whether it should.
Arjun's experience shows how easily this happens. During a performance review, his manager described him as "the heart of the team." Arjun felt proud. What nobody discussed, however, was the cost of being the heart. Within months, he had become an informal mentor to multiple colleagues, the go-to person for resolving team conflicts and a regular source of emotional support across the team. None of it appeared in his role description. While he was proud of this trait and appreciation he got, he was also exhausted. And because everyone kept telling him how good he was at it, nobody, including Arjun, stopped to ask whether he should be carrying so much.
What Is Not Being Said Loudly Enough
Honestly, this part may feel very direct, because the data and the lived experience both point in the same direction.
Priya's experience is a familiar example. As a mid-level manager in a financial services firm, she organizes farewell lunches, mediates conflicts, checks in on anxious team members and helps new joiners settle in.
Her male counterpart on the same team does none of this. He is seen as focused and high performing; whereas she is seen as warm and supportive. Neither was explicitly asked to play these roles. They simply absorbed the expectations embedded in the culture around them.
The problem is that invisible labour is rarely rewarded. It consumes time, energy and emotional bandwidth, yet is often treated as a personality trait rather than a meaningful professional contribution.
In many South Asian, East Asian, and collectivist cultural contexts, placing the needs of the group above personal needs is not just a workplace habit — it is a deeply held value. Saying no to someone who needs help can feel like a violation of core principles around community, loyalty, and respect. The idea of setting a boundary with a colleague who is struggling can feel not just uncomfortable but morally wrong. (Reference)
Vikram grew up in a family where you did not leave the table until everyone had been served. You did not rest until the work was done. You did not speak about your own struggles until everyone else's had been addressed. These values made him an extraordinary colleague. They also made it nearly impossible for him to protect his own energy without experiencing significant guilt. His caretaking at work was not a choice he made consciously. It was a value system he had embodied so completely that he could not see where it ended and he began.
For women from collectivist cultural backgrounds, the gendered and cultural expectations compound each other. The pressure to care, to accommodate, to prioritize others often arrives from multiple directions simultaneously and is so normalized that the person carrying it does not even recognize it as a burden. They simply experience it as who they are.
It is important to note that naming this is not assigning blame to culture or gender. It is an intention to make what’s hiding under the surface a little more visible. In fact, this invisible labour cannot be redistributed, valued or reduced until it is first seen.
Something for the leaders reading this.
If your team's emotional support is consistently being provided by the same person and that person is a woman or someone from a collectivist cultural background or both, remember that this is not a coincidence. It is a pattern worth examining carefully and honestly.
What the Caretaker Is Actually Carrying
This invisible labour is work that is real, requires efforts and also consequential, but that goes unrecognized as it does not produce a visible output on a performance dashboard. And because it is invisible, it is rarely counted when workload is assessed or resources are allocated. For the Almost-Burnt-Out Caretaker, the invisible labour typically includes:
None of this appears in a job description and all of it takes energy.
When it is consistently provided by one person without acknowledgement or reciprocity, it accumulates into a load that the Caretaker was never designed to carry alone.
How to Redistribute the Emotional Load
We will not look at the redistribution from the lens where we need to ask the Caretaker to stop caring at all. Instead, we will try to ensure that the work of caring for a team is shared, visible and most importantly valued.
For Managers
The starting point is visibility. Before you can redistribute something, you have to be able to see it.
Now For the Team
A Self-Preservation Plan You Can Actually Use
To all the Almost-Burnt-Out Caretakers, this section is specially written directly to you. Please do not mistake it for some advice. The intent behind this is to bring your attention to the position you are in and a few practical sets of tools for protecting yourselves without abandoning who you are.
A thought for You to sit with:
You are not responsible for the emotional wellbeing of everyone around you. You can care deeply about people and you clearly do without making their needs more important than your own. These are not contradictory positions. The most sustainable version of your care is the kind that comes from a place of genuine fullness instead of a feeling of exhaustion. Honestly, you deserve to be looked after too.
Finally, a prompt to sit with for all the readers.
When did you last let someone take care of you, without minimizing it or redirecting the conversation back to them?
And, what would it mean to receive support as readily as you give it?
The Caretaker's gift is not the ‘problem’. The problem is expecting one person to carry out what should belong to the whole team. And fixing that is a leadership challenge, not an individual one.

Ishita Mukherjee